AI Generated Adhan

Question:

What is the ruling regarding an Adhān generated by artificial intelligence (AI)?

The Fatwa

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

The Answer

An AI-generated Adhān (call to prayer) does not fulfil the Sharʿī (legal requirements of a valid Adhān. However, using an automated system as a Tathwīb (reminder for prayer) is permissible.

The Fiqh of the Answer

Imam al-Sarūjī (d.710 AH) mentions that the Adhān consists of fifteen Kalimāt (phrases)[i]. Kalimāt are only called Kalimāt because they hold meaning. Imam ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Bukhārī (d.730 AH) explains that in both linguistic and juristic usage, Kalām (speech) consists of two parts: Ṣūrah (form), i.e. the articulated letters and sounds, and Maʿnā (meaning), which represents the indication or reference to the object or concept being conveyed. For instance, when someone utters the word “pen,” the sounds and letters constituting the word serve as the Ṣūrah, while the implied object is the Mʿanā. Imam ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Bukhārī (d.730 AH) further notes that the indication of meaning (Dalālah al-Maʿnā) cannot exist without ʿAql (intellect), since speech was established for Bayān (clarification) to reveal what is in the heart. Therefore, mere sounds and letters without understanding do not constitute true speech, just as meaning cannot exist without intellect. He further illustrates this by stating that if a parrot were to recite a verse of Sajdah (prostration), no Sajdah becomes Wājib (obligatory) upon the listener, since the recitation did not originate from ʿAql[ii].

From this Uṣūlī perspective, an Adhān generated by AI, being produced through an automated system rather than articulated by a human Muʾadhdhin, cannot be considered a valid Adhān. It is, as Imam ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Bukhārī (d.730 AH) described, merely composed of letters and sounds which do not originate from a speaker with ‘Aql and Tamyīz.

Moreover, Imam al-Sarakhsī (d.483 AH) describes the Adhān as Dhikr Muʿaẓẓam (a great act of remembrance), comparing it to Tilāwah al-Qurʾān (recitation of the Qur’an) in the discussion of repeating it if performed while in a state of Janābah (major ritual impurity)[iii]. This comparison reinforces that the Adhān carries sanctity and meaning beyond mere vocalisation. Thus, an AI-generated Adhān is akin to a parrot’s Tilāwah, a sound devoid of Qasd (intent) and spiritual consciousness therefore given no legal weight and legal judgement.

Another key principle mentioned by the Fuqahāʾ (jurists) is the connection between the Adhān and Jamāʿah (congregational prayer). Imam al-Sarūjī (d.710 AH) notes that it is disliked for one person to give Adhān for two different mosques, as calling people to a congregation in which one does not participate goes against the purpose of the Adhān[iv]. This is because if a person gives the Adhān in one masjid and then performs his prayer there, and thereafter gives the Adhān and performs Ṣalāh in a second masjid, he would be calling people to a prayer that is not actually obligatory for him. For him, it would only be a Nafl (optional) prayer. Similarly, Imam al-Qudūrī (d.428 AH) states that women are not permitted to give the Adhān because they are not from the Ahl al-Jamāʿah (those obligated to perform congregational prayer)[v].

These rulings demonstrate that the Adhān is connected to the person calling the people towards the congregational prayer and is not treated merely as an independent announcement that can be separated from the person performing it. In the discussion of giving Adhān in two mosques, the jurists consider whether the Muʾadhdhin himself is participating in the prayer for which he is calling the people, while the ruling regarding women further demonstrates that the legal performance of the Adhān is connected to the characteristics and legal status of the person giving it. Therefore, the Adhān is not simply the reproduction of a prescribed set of words and sounds; rather, it is an act performed by a person calling towards the prayer and carries legal considerations relating to the Muʾadhdhin himself.

Imam al-Sarakhsī (d.483 AH) further draws a parallel between the Adhān and Ṣalāh, explaining that in one narration of Imam Ḥasan ibn Ziyād al-Luʾluʾī (d.204 AH), he states that if one performs Adhān without Wuḍūʾ (ablution) or in Janābah, it should be repeated, since Adhān shares attributes (Ṣifāt) with Ṣalāh, such as facing the Qiblah (direction of prayer)[vi]. This shows that the Adhān is not merely Iʿlām (announcement) but also a form of ʿIbādah (worship) requiring reverence.

Although the Aṣl (primary function) of Adhān is Iʿlām, as stated by Imam al-Sarūjī (d.710 AH)[vii], it has been established that the Adhān also embodies Dhikr (remembrance) and worship. These deeper aspects require a Muʾadhdhin (caller to prayer) who possesses ʿAql (intellect) and Qasd (intent) for the Adhān to fulfil its legal requirements.

As for using AI-generated Adhān for Tathwīb (secondary reminders after the Adhān), Imam al-Sarakhsī (d.483 AH) mentions that reminders after the Adhān were encouraged by the Mutāʾakhkhirūn (later scholars) due to Ghaflah (heedlessness) among people[viii]. He reports that the people of Kūfah would say Ḥayya ʿala al-Ṣalāh (come to prayer) and Ḥayya ʿala al-Falāḥ (come to success) twice after the Adhān and before the Iqāmah (commencement call to prayer) to emphasise the importance of prayer[ix]. This shows that using the same words as the Adhān for this secondary reminder was deemed perfectly acceptable.

Thus, Tathwīb serves as Mubālaghah fī al-Iʿlām (reinforcing the announcement), and this can be achieved by any recognised means[x], including automated reminders using the words of Adhān in public places. Accordingly, using an automated system for Tathwīb as a reminder is permissible. However, the Adhān itself, as an act of ʿIbādah and Dhikr, requires a human Muʾadhdhin who possesses ʿAql and Qasd. This is also alluded to by Mawlānā Khayr Muḥammad Jālandharī (d.1395 AH)[xi]

And Almighty Allah Taʿālā Alone Knows Best

Mawlānā Ahmad Kapadia

Birmingham, UK

Trainee Mufti

Reviewed and approved by

Mufti Asim Patel

Darul Iftaa Mu’adh Ibn Jabal

DISCLAIMER:

The views and opinions expressed in this answer belong only to the author and do not in any way represent or reflect the views of any institutions to which he may be affiliated.

Arguments and ideas propounded in this answer are based on the juristic interpretations and reasoning of the author. Given that contemporary issues and interpretations of contemporary issues are subjective in nature, another Mufti may reach different conclusions to the one expressed by the author. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure total accuracy and soundness from a Shari’ah perspective, the author is open to any correction or juristic guidance. On the event of any juristic shortcomings, the author will retract any or all of the conclusions expressed within this answer. 

The Shari’ah ruling given herein is based specifically on the scenario in question.  The author bears no responsibility towards any party that acts or does not act on this answer and is exempted from any and all forms of loss or damage.  This answer may not be used as evidence in any court of law without prior written consent from the author.  Consideration is only given and is restricted to the specific links provided, the author does not endorse nor approve of any other content the website may contain.

[i] أن الأذان عندنا خمسة عشر كلمة (الغاية)

[ii] (لِأَنَّ الْمُرَادَ بِالْكَلَامِ) كَذَا يَعْنِي الْخَبَرُ الَّذِي يَرْوِيهِ كَلَامٌ لَا مَحَالَةَ وَالْكَلَامُ فِي الْعُرْفِ مَالَهُ صُورَةٌ وَهِيَ أَنْ يُنَظَّمَ مِنْ حُرُوفٍ مُهَجَّاةٍ وَمَعْنًى وَهُوَ أَنْ يَدُلَّ عَلَى مَدْلُولِهِ وَالدَّلَالَةُ عَلَى مَعْنًى لَا تُوجَدُ بِدُونِ الْعَقْلِ؛ لِأَنَّهُ أَيْ الْكَلَامُ وُضِعَ لِلْبَيَانِ أَيْ لِإِظْهَارِ الْمَعْنَى الَّذِي وَقَعَ فِي الْقَلْبِ، وَلَا يَحْصُلُ الْبَيَانُ بِمُجَرَّدِ الصَّوْتِ وَالْحُرُوفِ بِلَا مَعْنًى، وَلَا يُوجَدُ الْمَعْنَى بِدُونِ الْعَقْلِ أَلَا تَرَى أَنَّهُ قَدْ يُسْمَعُ مِنْ الطُّيُورِ حُرُوفٌ مَنْظُومَةٌ وَيُسَمَّى ذَلِكَ لَحْنًا لَا كَلَامًا لِعَدَمِ صُدُورِهَا عَنْ عَقْلٍ وَتَمْيِيزٍ؛ وَلِهَذَا لَا يَجِبُ سُجُودُ التِّلَاوَةِ بِقِرَاءَةِ الْبَبغَاءِ عِنْدَ أَكْثَرِ الْمُحَقِّقِينَ لِعَدَمِ صُدُورِهَا عَنْ عَقْلٍ وَتَمْيِيز (كشف الأسرار)

[iii] وَجْهُ ظَاهِرِ الرِّوَايَةِ مَا رُوِيَ أَنَّ بِلَالًا رُبَّمَا أَذَّنَ وَهُوَ عَلَى غَيْرِ وُضُوءٍ ثُمَّ الْأَذَانُ ذِكْرٌ مُعَظَّمٌ فَيُقَاسَ بِقِرَاءَةِ الْقُرْآنِ وَالْمُحْدِثُ لَا يُمْنَعُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَيُمْنَعُ مِنْهُ الْجُنُبُ فَكَذَلِكَ الْأَذَانُ وَفِي ظَاهِرِ الرِّوَايَةِ جَعْلُ الْإِقَامَةِ كَالْأَذَانِ فِي أَنَّهُ لَا بَأْسَ بِهِ إذَا كَانَ مُحْدِثًا (المبسوط)

[iv] ويكره أن يؤذن في مسجدين؛ لأنه إذا صلى في أحدهما يكون متنفلا في الآخر، فيكون داعيا إلى ما لا يُجيب بنفسه. (الغاية)

[v] أحب إلي أن يعيدوا؛ فلأن فعلها لم يقع على الوجه المأذون فيه؛ لأنها ليست من أهل الجماعة (شرحه على مختصر الكرخي)

[vi] وَوَجْهُ رِوَايَةِ الْحَسَنِ - رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى - أَنَّ الْأَذَانَ مُشَبَّهٌ بِالصَّلَاةِ وَلِهَذَا يَسْتَقْبِلُ فِيهِ الْقِبْلَةَ، وَالصَّلَاةُ مَعَ الْحَدَثِ لَا تَجُوزُ فَمَا هُوَ مِنْ أَسْبَابِهِ مُشَبَّهٌ بِهِ يُكْرَهُ مَعَهُ (المبسوط)

[vii] والأصل فيه الإعلام (الغاية)

[viii] وَأَمَّا الْمُتَأَخِّرُونَ فَاسْتَحْسَنُوا التَّثْوِيبَ فِي جَمِيعِ الصَّلَوَاتِ لِأَنَّ النَّاسَ قَدْ ازْدَادَ بِهِمْ الْغَفْلَةُ وَقَلَّمَا يَقُومُونَ عِنْدَ سَمَاعِ الْأَذَانِ (المبسوط)

[ix] وَجَعَلُوا التَّثْوِيبَ بَيْنَ الْأَذَانِ وَالْإِقَامَةِ حَيَّ عَلَى الصَّلَاةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ حَيَّ عَلَى الْفَلَاحِ مَرَّتَيْنِ. (المبسوط)

[x] فَيُسْتَحْسَنُ التَّثْوِيبُ لِلْمُبَالَغَةِ فِي الْإِعْلَامِ وَمِثْلُ هَذَا يَخْتَلِفُ بِاخْتِلَافِ أَحْوَالِ النَّاسِ. (المبسوط)

[xi] ٹیپ سے نشر ہونے والی اذان شرعا اذان مشروع کے حکم میں نہیں اس لیئے سنت اذان ادانہ ہوگی۔ حسب معمول موذن سے اذان کہلوائی جائے (خیر الفتاوی:۲/۲۲۵)